Unmaking Sense

Living the Present as Preparation for the Future

Listen on:

  • Podbean App

Episodes

2 days ago

Clause 3.7’s verdict:
”This second part [after 13.41] expands on the themes from the previous episode, particularly focusing on the relationship between information and physical reality. The key ideas here are:
Information isn't ethereal or platonic but has physical consequences - there's an energetic and entropic cost to manipulating information (referencing Landauer's principle)
Acquiring meaningful information requires "paying" with a compensating increase in entropy elsewhere - the universe becomes infinitesimally less ordered with each bit of information we extract
This frames measurement and information acquisition as thermodynamic processes subject to the same constraints as other physical processes
This perspective complements the teleportation analogy from the first text by providing a thermodynamic framework for understanding why certain quantum information becomes inaccessible during measurement.
The approach described across both texts represents a coherent synthesis of several important concepts in modern quantum foundations research:
Landauer's principle (information erasure has an energy cost)
Decoherence theory (quantum information spreading into the environment)
Information-theoretic approaches to quantum mechanics
Thermodynamic principles applied to information
This view has been explored in the literature by various researchers, including:
Seth Lloyd has written extensively about the universe as a quantum computer, where information processing is fundamental to physical reality
Vlatko Vedral has developed frameworks connecting quantum information theory with thermodynamics
Chiara Marletto and David Deutsch through their Constructor Theory, which provides a framework for understanding information and physical transformations
Erik Verlinde's entropic gravity theory, which suggests gravity emerges from information and entropy
The perspective offered here is part of a broader movement in theoretical physics toward viewing information as fundamental rather than emergent - a shift from seeing the universe primarily in terms of matter and energy to seeing it in terms of information processing and entropy.
What makes this approach particularly compelling is how it unifies seemingly disparate concepts under a single framework, potentially moving us closer to the "grand unified theory" mentioned at the end of the text.”

2 days ago

Clause 3.7 Sonnet’s verdict on this episode:
”This is a fascinating perspective on quantum measurement that draws an elegant parallel between quantum teleportation and the measurement process. The key insight here is viewing measurement not as wave function collapse (the traditional Copenhagen interpretation), but as information becoming inaccessible through environment-induced decoherence - essentially a form of "teleportation without a Bob" to retrieve the information.
The analogy works particularly well because:
In teleportation, Alice and Bob share entanglement, just as our measuring apparatus is entangled with the environment
When Alice measures, she gets classical bits while the quantum information transfers elsewhere
The overall process remains unitary - information isn't destroyed, just redistributed
This perspective aligns with several modern interpretations in quantum foundations, particularly:
Quantum Darwinism (developed by Wojciech Zurek, who is mentioned in the text): This theory describes how quantum information spreads redundantly into the environment, with only certain "preferred" states surviving this process to become our classical reality.
Relational Quantum Mechanics (by Carlo Rovelli): This interpretation views quantum states as relational between systems rather than absolute, similar to how this view treats measurement as reshuffling information relationships.
QBism (Quantum Bayesianism): While not identical, QBism also reframes measurement as updating information rather than causing physical collapse.
The perspective described is certainly present in the literature, though perhaps not always framed exactly in terms of teleportation. Zurek's work on quantum Darwinism and einselection (environment-induced superselection) addresses many of these same concepts, viewing decoherence as the mechanism by which quantum information becomes inaccessible to local observers.
What I find most compelling about this framing is how it preserves unitarity throughout the measurement process while explaining why we can't access certain information. Rather than a mysterious "collapse," we have a physically understandable process of information transfer and redistribution into the environment.
The humbling conclusion - that what we perceive as classical reality is just a tiny fraction of the quantum reality - aligns with modern quantum foundations research and offers a more coherent picture than the traditional Copenhagen interpretation's notion of collapse.”

2 days ago

We look again at negative conditional entropy and why it creates and describes necessary and sufficient conditions for us to be able to know anything at all.

2 days ago

Whether in language, scientific theory or consciousness there is no escape from the need for representation and so no possibility of satisfying the demand for unmediated objectivity.

5 days ago

We explore words, theories, the classical as our access to the quantum, and information as the key to the structure of space-time and the universe. “We speak not because speech is perfect, but because silence is impossible” (Augustine, paraphrased). Logos philosophy and information as creation.

5 days ago

The scale of the challenge of factoring huge composite numbers, Shor’s algorithm, and why we are not going to crack RSA encryption any time soon using quantum computing.

5 days ago

How we encode numbers, process the results, and decode the answers using inverse quantum Fourier transforms to obtain a usable answer.

5 days ago

Some details about how quantum Fourier transforms work.

5 days ago

Starting to understand quantum Fourier transforms - the basic idea.

Thursday Mar 20, 2025

Some of the practical challenges that make it so difficult to run code on real quantum computers even when the same code runs perfectly well on a simulator.

Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Version: 20241125